Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4904 (MAD)

R.B.SRINIVASAN v. SUSHIL LALWANI

CRL MP/6464/2025 · 2026-04-15

C Kumarappan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.M.P.No.6464 of 2025 in Crl..O.P.No.20063 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 15.4.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Crl.M.P.No.6464 of 2025 in Crl.O.P.No.20063 of 2024 R.B.Srinivasan ... Petitioner/defacto complainant Vs. 1. Sushil Lalwani 2. Aarthi Lalwani 3. R.Siddarth 4. D.Senthil Kumar 5. State Represented by Inspector of Police, CCB, Tambaram ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 483(3) of BNSS, 2023 to cancel the anticipatory bail granted to the 1 to 4 respondents in Crl.O.P.No.20063 of 2024 by an order dated 11.09.2024. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Jagannathan For Respondent : Mr.P.Dhileepan Government Advocate (Crl. Side) ORDER This petition has been filed to cancel the anticipatory bail granted to the 1 to 4 respondents in Crl.O.P.No.20063 of 2024 by an order dated 11.09.2024. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.M.P.No.6464 of 2025 in Crl..O.P.No.20063 of 2024 2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would seek cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the respondents 1 to 4 on the ground that the documents relied by them are false. 3. When this Court put a question as to the falsity over the documents, the learned counsel for the petitioner was not in a position to immediately demonstrate before this Court. 4. At this juncture, learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that the subsequent investigation found that the FIR was a mistake of fact and the same was filed before the learned Judicial Magistrate. 5. In reply, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that he received SMS in this regard and he already moved application before this Court challenging the closure report. 6. Considering the peculiar circumstances, this Court finds no reason to cancel the anticipatory bail granted to the respondents ( 1 to 4). 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.M.P.No.6464 of 2025 in Crl..O.P.No.20063 of 2024 7. Accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed. 15.4.2026 sma To 1. Inspector of Police, CCB, Tambaram 2. The Public Prosecutor Madras High Court. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.M.P.No.6464 of 2025 in Crl..O.P.No.20063 of 2024 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. Sma Crl.M.P.No.6464 of 2025 in Crl.O.P.No.20063 of 2024 15.4.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis