Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49035 (MAD)

SENTHIL KUMAR v. The State rep by The Inspector of Police

CRL OP/12705/2025 · 2025-04-25

G K Ilanthiraiyan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.No.12705 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 25.04.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No.12705 of 2025 1.Senthil Kumar 2.Murugan ..... Petitioners Vs 1.The State Rep by The Inspector of Police, Hosur Town Police Station, Krishnagiri. Crime No. 23 of 2013. 2. Varalakshmi ..... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to call for the records and quash the proceedings in P.R.C.No. 02 of 2014 on the file of the Learned Judicial Magistrate-II, Hosur, Krishnagiri in Crime No. 23 of 2013 on the file of the 1st respondent for offences under Section 323 of Indian Penal Code, 3(I)(X)(XI) SC/ST Act, 1989. For Petitioners : Mr.K.Selvaraj For R1 : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.Side) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.12705 of 2025 O R D E R This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the proceedings in P.R.C.No.02 of 2014 pending on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Hosur, Krishnagiri, thereby taken cognizance for the offences under Sections 323 of Indian Penal Code and Section 3(I)(X)(XI) of SC/ST Act, 1989. 2. Pending this petition, the parties have decided to bury their hatchet and compromise the dispute amicably among themselves. 3. A Joint Memo of Compromise has been filed before this Court, which has been signed by the petitioners, the second respondent and their respective counsel. All the parties are present and identified by the Police. In order to identify the respective parties, they have also produced the copies of the Aadhaar Card are made part of the record. This Court also enquired both the parties and was satisfied that the parties have come to an amicable settlement between themselves. 4. Under such circumstances, no useful purpose will be served in keeping the proceeding pending, even though, the offences involved https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.12705 of 2025 are not compoundable in nature. In the light of the guidelines given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in 2017 9 SCC 641-(Parbathbhai Aahir @ Parbathbhai Vs. State of Gujrath), this Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, quashes the proceeding in P.R.C.No.02 of 2014, pending trial on the file of the Judicial Magistrate-II, Hosur, Krishnagiri. 5. In view of the above, the proceedings in P.R.C.No.02 of 2014 pending on the file of the Judicial Magistrate-II, Hosur, Krishnagiri, is hereby quashed. The terms of Joint Memo of Compromise shall form part and parcel of this Order. The petitioners shall pay a sum of Rs.5,000/-, (Rupees Five Thousand only) as costs, to the Chief Justice Relief Fund, Tamil Nadu, forthwith and file a photocopy of the receipt along with a memo reporting compliance in the Registry. 6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands allowed. 25.04.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No Lpp https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.12705 of 2025 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. Lpp To 1.The Judicial Magistrate-II, Hosur, Krishnagiri. 2. The Inspector of Police, Hosur Town Police Station, Krishnagiri. 3. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai. Crl.O.P.No.12705 of 2025 25.04.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis