Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49033 (MAD)

N.PUGALENDI v. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION

WP/14732/2025 · 2025-04-28

N Anand Venkatesh

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 14732 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 28-04-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH WP No. 14732 of 2025 1. N.Pugalendi S/o.Nallusamy, No.5/449,East Street, Tirupeyar, Melapuliyur(east), Perambalur-621 107 Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Inspector General Of Registration 100, Santhome High Road, Chennai-28 2.The District Registrar Tiruvallur District Registrar Office, Jvc Complex, Near Imr, Tiruvallur-631293 3.The Sub Registrar Redhills Sub Registrar Office, Redhills, Chennai-600 052 4.The Tahsildar Tahsildar Office, NGO Nagar Extension, Ponneri, Tamilnadu- 601204 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 14732 of 2025 Respondent(s) PRAYER Writ petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the issue of writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for records of the impugned refusal endorsement made by the 3rd respondent dated 22.1.2024 in sale deed dated 22.1.2024 bearing pending Doc.No.P.No.12 of 2024 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to register the same with regular number. For Petitioner(s): Mr. T.M.Mano For Respondent(s): Mr.K.Karthick Jagannath Government Advocate for R1 to R4 ORDER This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned refusal endorsement made by the 3 rd respondent on 22.01.2024 wherein the 3 rd respondent has refused to register the sale deed dated 20.01.2024 on the ground that the petitioner must get a No objection certificate from the Air Force Authority. 2. Heard Mr.T.M.Mano, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.K.Karthick Jagannath, learned Government Advocate for respondents 1 to 4. 3. In the considered view of this Court, the 4 th respondent has already https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 14732 of 2025 submitted a communication dated 08.01.2025 to the 3 rd respondent to the effect that the subject property does not come with the ambit of the Air force. Inspite of the same, the 3 rd respondent is insisting for a No objection certificate. That apart, it is also seen from records that the properties which are adjacent to the subject property, has been registered as document Nos.1414 of 2018 and 79 of 2025. 4. In view of the above, the 3 rd respondent is directed to once again verify from the 4 th respondent and if the subject property does not fall within the authority of the Air force, there shall be a direction to the 3 rd respondent to register the sale deed, if it is otherwise in order. 5. This writ petition is allowed with the above directions. No costs. 28-04-2025 rka Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 14732 of 2025 To 1.The Inspector General Of Registration 100, Santhome High Road, Chennai-28 2.The District Registrar Tiruvallur District Registrar Office, Jvc Complex, Near Imr, Tiruvallur-631293 3.The Sub Registrar Redhills Sub Registrar Office, Redhills, Chennai-600 052 4.The Tahsildar Tahsildar Office, Ngo Nagar Extension, Ponneri, Tamilnadu- 601204 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 14732 of 2025 N.ANAND VENKATESH J. rka WP No. 14732 of 2025 28-04-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis