Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49033 (CHH)

T.S. MATHEEW v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/988/2020 · 2025-11-26

Shri Deepak Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:57676 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 988 of 2020 T.S. Matheew S/o Late Shri T.P. Samuel, Aged About 62 Years R/o C-14, Sant Josef Colony, Amlidih, Ravigram, Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Water Resources Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Under Secretary, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Water Resources Department Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Engineer In Chief, Water Resources Department Mahanadi Godawari Basin, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - The Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department Mahanadi Godawari Basin, Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5 - The Superintending Engineer, Water Resources Department, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 6 - The Executive Engineer, Water Resources Department, Raipur Division Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 7 - The Joint Director, Treasury, Account And Pension Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents. Digitally signed by AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI DN: cn=AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI, ou=HIGH COURT, o=HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, st=Chhattisgarh, c=IN Date: 2025.11.27 15:19:22 +0530 2 For Petitioner : None. For Respondent/State : Mr. Amandeep Singh, Panel Lawyer. SB : Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari Order on Board 27.11 .2025 1. On the last date of hearing i.e. 18.07.2025, no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Today also, even in the second call, no representation is made. 2. In the circumstances, this Court is left with no option except to dismiss the case for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Deepak Kumar Tiwari) Judge Ajay