RAM RATAN v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH SECRETARY HOME GOVT OF U.K. DEHRADUN
BAC/13/2023 · 2025-09-02
Pankaj Purohit
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4903 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4903 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:7790 SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
BAC No.13 of 2023 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
List revised.
2. None present for the applicant.
3. Mr. S.C. Dumka, learned A.G.A. with Ms. Sweta Badola Dobhal, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand.
4. From perusal of the record, it transpires that several opportunities have been given to the applicant to remove the defect(s) by this Court as well as by the Registry. But, neither the defect(s) pointed out by the Registry has been removed by the applicant nor is he present before this Court today.
5. In view of the above, the present bail cancellation application is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Pankaj Purohit, J.)
02.09.2025 PN