Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49027 (AP)

RAVULAPALLI VENKATESWARLU v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/15315/2023 · 2025-12-01

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010295092023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.15315 of 2023 Between: 1. RAVULAPALLI VENKATESWARLU, S/O.R.RAMAIAH AGED 60 YEARS, OCC.. CULTIVATION R/ O. S. L. GUDIPADU VILLAGE, BALLIKURAVA MANDAL BAPATLA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, BAPATLA DISTRICT, BAPATLA, AP 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CHIRALA, BAPATLA DISTRICT, AP 4. THE TAHSILDAR, BALLIKURAVA MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BALLIKURAVAPOLICE STATION, BALLIKURAVA MANDAL BAPATLA DISTRICT, A.P. 6. MADALA KOTAIAH, S/O.NANNAIAH AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER R/ O. S. L. GUDIPADU VILLAGE, BALLIKURAVA MANDAL BAPATLA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 7. MADALA SRINU, S/O.NANNAIAH AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER R/O.S.L.GUDIPADU VILLAGE, BALLIKURAVA MANDAL BAPATLA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 8. RAVULAPALLI EDUKONDALU, S/O.PEDDAKOTAIAH AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER R/O.S.L.GUDIPADU VILLAGE, BALLIKURAVA MANDAL BAPATLA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 9. RAVULAPALLI ANJANEYLU, S/O.PEDDAKOTAIAH AGE NOT 2 KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER R/O.S.L.GUDIPADU VILLAGE, BALLIKURAVA MANDAL BAPATLA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not reinstalling boundary stones around the petitioner'sland in Sy.No.102-4C3, 102-4C1, admeasuring an extent of Ac.0.96 cents, Ac.0.85 cents and Ac.0.65 cents respectively situated in S.L.Gudipadu Village, Ballikurava Mandal, Bapatla District, Andhra Pradesh as per the survey reports dated 26-10-2022 and 03-12-2022 of the Village Surveyor, S.L. Gudipadu and Mandal Deputy Surveyor, Ballikurava Mandal, Prakasam District is illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the respondents to reinstall the boundary stones around the petitioner land in Sy.No.102-4C3, 102-4C1, IO2-4A, admeasuring an extent of Ac.0.96 cents, Ac.0.85 cents and Ac.0.65 cents respectively situated in S.L.Gudipadu Village, Ballikurava Mandal, Bapatla District. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KAVITHA GOTTIPATI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. KOTI REDDY IDAMAKANTI 2. GP FOR HOME 3. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: "….to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not reinstalling boundary stones around the petitioner's land in Sy.No.102-4C3, 102-4C1, 102-4A, admeasuring an extent of Ac.0.96 cents, Ac.0.85 cents and Ac.0.65 cents respectively situated in S.L.Gudipadu Village, Ballikurava Mandal, Bapatla District, Andhra Pradesh as per the survey reports dated 26-10-2022 and 03-12-2022 of the Village Surveyor, S.L. Gudipadu and Mandal Deputy Surveyor, Ballikurava Mandal, Prakasam District is illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the respondents to reinstall the boundary stones around the petitioner land in Sy.No.102-4C3, 102-4C1, IO2-4A, admeasuring an extent of Ac.0.96 cents, Ac.0.85 cents and Ac.0.65 cents respectively situated in S.L.Gudipadu Village, Ballikurava Mandal, Bapatla District and pass such other orders…." 2. The short grievance of the writ petitioner in the present Writ Petition is that the unofficial respondents have illegally removed the boundary stones installed by the revenue officials around the land of the petitioner situated in Sy.Nos.102-4C3, 102-4C1 and 102-4A admeasuring Ac.0.96 cents, Ac.0.85 cents and Ac.0.65 cents respectively situated in S.L.Gudipadu village, Ballikurava Mandal, Bapatla District. Despite repeated requests, the revenue officials have not taken appropriate action to reinstall the boundary stones. Hence, the present Writ Petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondents 4 to reinstall the boundary stones around the petitioner’s land in the aforesaid survey numbers. 3. The 4th respondent – Tahasildar had filed counter and stated that the unofficial respondents have illegally removed the boundary stones installed by the revenue officials around the petitioner’s land which is located in Sy.Nos.102-4C3, 102-4C1 and 102-4A situated in S.L.Gudipadu village, Ballikurava Mandal, Bapatla District, and the revenue officials have already initiated appropriate action to install the boundary stones around the petitioner’s land and a report is awaited from the 5th respondent – Station House Officer, Ballikurava Police Station, Ballikurava Mandal and on receipt of the orders from the 5th respondent, the 4th respondent will take immediate action without any delay. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the unofficial respondents would submit that as the official respondents have not conducted survey properly and admitted orally, the unofficial respondents have removed the boundary stones. 5. Without going into the merits of the case, the present Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the official respondents to reinstall the boundary 5 stones around the petitioner’s land in Sy.Nos.102-4C3, 102-4C1 and 102-4A admeasuring Ac.0.96 cents, Ac.0.85 cents and Ac.0.65 cents respectively situated in S.L.Gudipadu village, Ballikurava Mandal, Bapatla District. However, if the unofficial respondents are aggrieved for any improper survey conducted by the official respondents, they are at liberty to file appropriate proceedings before appropriate authority according to law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 02.12.2025 siva 6 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.15315 of 2023 Date: 02.12.2025 siva