[2025:RJ-JP:48513] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7164/2025 1. Kamlesh Meena Alias Kamal Meena, Son Of Nandlal Meena, Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of Ashok Vatika, Vatika, Police Station Sanganer Sadar, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Vijay Meena, Son Of Kanaram, Aged About 31 Years, Resident Of Naya Wali Dhani, Vatika, Police Station Sanganer Sadar, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. Vijendra Son Of Boduram, Aged About 20 Years, Resident Of Naya Wali Dhani, Vatika, Police Station Sanganer Sadar, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 4. Vikash Meena Son Of Jagdish, Aged About 19 Years, Resident Of Naya Wali Dhani, Vatika, Police Station Sanganer Sadar, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 5. Chatur Singh Son Of Shri Kishore Singh, Aged About 78 Years, Resident Of Bhatawala, Mohanpura, Vatika, Sanganer, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 6. Kailash Meena Son Of Kanaram Meena, Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of Naya Wali Ki Dhani, Vatika, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 7. Vijendra Singh Sisodiya Alias Pankaj Singh Sisodiya, Son Of Shri Raghuveeer Singh Sisodiya, Aged About 44 Years, Resident Of Rajputon Ka Mohalla, Vatika, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Public Prosecutor. 2. Ved Prakash Purohit Son Of Ram Prakash Purohit, Aged About 37 Years, Resident Of B 30, Lakhna Road, Gopi Kishan Watika, Watika, Sanganer, Sanganer Sadar, Jaipur City ( South), Rajasthan, India. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Jaideep Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr.Vivek Choudhary, PP Mr.Navdeep Singh JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND [2025:RJ-JP:48513] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-7164/2025] Order 28/11/2025 1. By way of filing this criminal misc. petition, a prayer has been made for quashing of the impugned F.I.R. No.636/2025 registered at Police Station Sanganer Sadar, District Jaipur City (South) for offence under Sections 189(2), 126(2), 115(2) & 324(4) BNS, 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that after registration of impugned F.I.R., the complainant-respondent has filed a compromise in favour of the petitioners and now, the complainant does not want to prosecute the petitioners. 3. This Court vide order dated 07.11.2025 directed the parties to appear before the Investigating Officer to verify the factum of the compromise arrived at between the parties and the Investigating Officer was further directed to submit the verification report for perusal of this Court. 4. In pursuance of the aforesaid order, the parties have appeared before the Investigating Officer and the complainant has submitted that he does not wish to prosecute the petitioners. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners placed reliance upon the judgments passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab reported in 2012 (10) SCC 303 and in the case of The State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Laxmi Narayan reported in 2019 (5) SCC 688. Learned counsel submits that under these circumstances, the proceedings pending against the petitioners may be quashed. 6. Heard and considered the submissions made at the Bar and perused the material available on the record. [2025:RJ-JP:48513] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-7164/2025] 7. Considering the above factual aspect of the matter and the verification report so furnished by the S.H.O. Police Station Sanganer Sadar, District Jaipur City (South) as well as looking to the fact that the parties have amicably settled the dispute and now, the complainant does not wish to prosecute the petitioners and applying the principles as laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the cases of Gian Singh (supra) and Laxmi Narayan (supra), this Court deems it just and proper to invoke the inherent powers of this Court contained under Section 528 BNSS. 8. Accordingly, the instant criminal misc. petition stands allowed. The proceedings arising out of the impugned F.I.R. No.636/2025 registered at the Police Station Sanganer Sadar, District Jaipur City (South) against the petitioners stand quashed and set-aside. 9. The stay application and all pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 10. The report furnished by the Investigating Officer is ordered to be retained on record. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /49