Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49022 (RAJ)

MAHENDRA SON OF MOHANLAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/13625/2025 · 2025-10-16

Chandra Prakash Shrimali

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:42546] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13110/2025 Nirmal Singh Alias Kana S/o Pappu Kothari, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Village Luhara, Police Station Niwai Sadar, District Tonk, At Present Makan No. 23, Shyam Nagar-B, Madarampura, Police Station Muhana, District Jaipur (South) (Presently Petitioner Confined In Central Jail At Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13625/2025 Mahendra Son Of Mohanlal, Aged About 19 Years, Resident Of Village Nimeda,police Station Phagi, District Jaipur, Presently Resident Of House No. 23 Shyam Nagar-B, Madrampura,police Station Muhana, Jaipur South. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Narsi Prasad Sharma Mr. Anshul Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakad, PP Mr. Onkar Singh Rajpurohit, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI Order 16/10/2025 1. These bail applications have been filed by the petitioners under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No.914/2025 registered at Police Station Muhana, District Jaipur City (South) for the offence(s) under Section(s) 331(4) & 305 (a) of B.N.S. [2025:RJ-JP:42546] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-13110/2025] 2. Learned counsels for the petitioners submit that the accused- petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in these cases, wherein the allegation pertains to the commission of theft against the accused-petitioners. They further submit that no recovery is pending at the instance of the accused-petitioners. They also submits that the accused-petitioners have been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioners may be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the bail applications. 4. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the cases, perused the material available on record the accused-petitioners have been in judicial custody since long but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the cases, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail. 5. Therefore, these bail applications are allowed and accused- petitioners namely 1.Nirmal Singh Alias Kana S/o Pappu Kothari 2. Mahendra Son Of Mohanlal are ordered to be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioners shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI),J GAURAV SHARMA /45-46