HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1431/2025 1. Shivani Singh Daughter Of Shri Koushal Kuamr W/o Naman Kumar, Aged About 21 Years, Resident Of Phaloi, Sidhpura District Kasganj Police Thana Sidhpura Uttar Pradesh At Present R/o House No. 38 Bhakheda Mukhya Alwar Rajasthan. 2. Naman Kumar Son Of Shri Jagdeesh Kumar, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of House No. 38 Bhakheda Mukhya Alwar Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. The Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Lal Kothi, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Superintendent Of Police, Alwar(Raj.) 4. Superintendent Of Police, Kasganj(U.p.) 5. S.h.o. Police Station Arawali Vihar, Alwar District Alwar(Raj.) 6. S.h.o. Police Station Sidhpura, District Kasganj (U.p.) 7. Kaushal Kumar S/o Shri Kripal Singh, Resident Of Phaloi, Sidhpura District Kasganj Police Thana Sidhpura (Uttar Pradesh). 8. Yatendra Kumar S/o Shri Kripal Singh, Resident Of Phaloi, Sidhpura District Kasganj Police Thana Sidhpura (Uttar Pradesh). 9. Amit Kumar S/o Shri Kripal Singh, Resident Of Phaloi, Sidhpura District Kasganj Police Thana Sidhpura (Uttar Pradesh). 10. Kailash Chand Meena, R/o Shayam Nagar Colony, Bhakheda Mukhya Alwar Rajasthan. 11. Sujata Meena W/o Kailash Chand Meena, R/o Shayam Nagar Colony, Bhakheda Mukhya Alwar, Rajasthan. ----Respondents (2 of 3) [CRLW-1431/2025] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Prasas Gautam Mr. Jitesh Chugh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Gutpa, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 04/11/2025 1. The petitoners have preferred this petition for issuance of necessary directions to the official-respondents to provide adequate security and protection to them on the ground that they are facing grave threat to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondent(s). 2. Counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are major and they have solemnized marriage with each other on 29.10.2025 and the same has been registered by the competent authority. Counsel submits that prior to approaching this Court the petitioners have already submitted representation before the concerned Station House Officer/Nodal Officer pursuant to the orders passed by the Co- ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Suman Meena vs. State of Rajasthan (S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No.792/2024). Counsel submits that appropriate directions be issued in favour of the petitioners. 3. It is well settled legal position that the life and personal liberty of the individuals has to be protected except according to procedure established by law, as mandated by Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Further, as per Section 29 of the (3 of 3) [CRLW-1431/2025] Rajasthan Police Act, 2007 every police officer is duty bound to protect the life and liberty of the citizens. 4. Considering the arguments put forward by the learned counsel for the petitioners and looking to the fact that the petitioners have already submitted appropriate representation/application seeking protection before the concerned Station House Officer/Nodal Officer, it is expected from the officer concerned to look into the matter in terms of the directions issued by this Court in the case of Suman Meena (supra) and ensure that after analyzing the threat perceptions, if necessitated, may pass necessary orders to provide adequate security and protection to the petitioners. 5. It is made clear that any observation made by this Court/Nodal Officer shall not affect any criminal and civil proceeding initiated against the petitioners. 6. With the aforesaid observations, the instant criminal writ petition stands disposed of. The stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/177