SRI SUBHAS S/O GULAPPA MALAGI v. BASAVARAJ S/O GIRIJEPPA BADIGER
MFA/101994/2022 · 2025-02-05
Hanchate Sanjeevkumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4902 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4902 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:2236 MFA No. 101994 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.101994 OF 2022 (MV-D) BETWEEN:
1.
SRI SUBHAS S/O. GULAPPA MALAGI, AGE. 68 YEARS, OCC. RETIRED FROM PRIVATE JOB,
2.
SMT. SUVARNA W/O. SUBHAS MALAGI, AGE: 56 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE WIFE, BOTH ARE R/O: B.R. PUJAR BUILDING, NEAR SHARANABASAVESHWAR HIGH SCHOOL, SHARANABASAVESHWAR NAGAR, BETAGERI-GADAG, DIST. GADAG. …APPELLANT
(BY SRI CHANDRASHEKHAR M.HOSAMANI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SHRI. BASAVARAJ S/O. GIRIJEPPA BADIGER, AGE: 41 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: NEAR MARUTI TEMPLE, KESHWAPUR, HUBBALLI-580 020.
2.
CHOLAMADLAM M.S.
GENERAL INSURANCE COM. LTD., BRANCH OFFICE, 1ST FLOOR, KALBURGI SQUARE, DESHPANDE NAGAR, HUBBALLI-580 029. …RESPONDENTS
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173 (1) OF MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988, PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS APPEAL BY ENHANCING THE COMPENSATION BY MODIFYING THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD OF THE MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, GADAG, DATED 29.12.2021 IN MVC NO.6/2020, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Digitally signed by MALLIKARJUN RUDRAYYA KALMATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:2236 MFA No. 101994 of 2022
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR)
Though four opportunities were given for compliance of office objections, but have been not complied with. Today also for fifth time, the matter is posted for non compliance of office objections, but there is no representation for the appellant nor there is compliance of office objections. Therefore, the appeal stands dismissed for non compliance of office objections.
Sd/- (HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) JUDGE
SRA List No.: 2 Sl No.: 76