Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4902 (CHH)

Vinod Kumar Tiwari v. State Of Chhattisgarh

WPS/7050/2016 · 2025-06-15

Shri Sachin Singh Rajput

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:24642 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7050 of 2016 1 - Vinod Kumar Tiwari S/o Late Ram Narayan Tiwari, Aged About 57 Years Presently Posted As State House Office, Police Station Gidam, District Dantewada R/o Police Station Gidam, District South Bastar Dantewada Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Home, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Post Office Rakhi, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh 2 - Director General Of Police Police Head Quarter Chhattisgarh, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Additional Director General Of Police Recruit, Police Head Quarter, Chhattisgarh, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Superintendent Of Police, Dantewada, District South Bastar Dantewada, Chhattisgarh, District : Dantewada, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anirudh Singh, Adv on behalf of Mr. Dhiraj Kumar Wankhede, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Dilman Rati Minj, G. A. (Hon’ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput) Order on Board 16/06/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed seeking following relief:- 2 10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased quash the list of Sub- Inspector eligible for promotion to the post of Inspector for year 2016 published on 06.12.2016 (Annexure P/1). 10.2That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to consider the petitioner for promotion to the post of Inspector from the date on which the petitioner became eligible i.e. 01.01.2014. 10.3 cost of the petition may also be granted to the petitioner. 10.4 The Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief(s), including the cost of this petition, as it appears to be fit and appropriate to this Hon’ble Court. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during pendency of the writ petition, the respondent has issued eligibility list for the promotion from the post of Sub Inspector to Inspector and vide order dated 31.12.2016 promotion order (Annexure R-2) has been issued by the respondent No.2/ Director General of Police, Raipur, therefore, he prays that he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to challenge the said order in lieu of eligibility list issued by the authorities which is filed by the respondents along with return dated 04.02.2017. 3. Not opposed by the other side. 4. In view of above, this writ petition is dismissed with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Sachin Singh Rajput) JUDGE Parul PARUL MITTAL Digitally signed by PARUL MITTAL Date: 2025.06.18 14:48:53 +0530