Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49011 (BOM)

VINOD S/O OMPRAKASH MEENA v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. PSO, PS SAVNER, NAGPUR AND ANR.

BA/501/2025 · 2025-06-27

Urmila Joshi Phalke

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(1) 925.ba.501.2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (BA) NO. 501 OF 2025 Vinod s/o Omprakash Meena Vs. State of Maharashtra, through Police Station Officer, Police Station Savner, Nagpur and another -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. N. R. Tekade, Counsel h/f Mr. S. M. Wandre Counsel for the applicant. Ms. H. N. Prabhu, APP for non-applicant No.1/State. Mr. Syed Salman Ali, appointed Counsel for non-applicant No.2. CORAM : URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J. DATED : 27/06/2025 1. The application is for grant of bail. 2. Heard learned Counsel for the applicant to some extent. Perused the investigation papers and I have shown my disinclination to grant bail. Hence, learned Counsel for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the application. 3. The application is disposed of as withdrawn. 4. The fees of the appointed Counsel be quantified as per rules. (URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.) Sarkate 2025:BHC-NAG:6292