Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49010 (AP)

Dodda Pentaiah v. The Station House Officer

WP/10099/2021 · 2025-10-07

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010174762021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 10099 OF 2021 Between: 1. Dodda Pentaiah, S/o Pullaiah, Aged about 60yrs, Occ.Agriculture, R/ o Yadava Bazar, Chillakallu village, Jaggaiahpet mandal, Krishna District ...Petitioner AND 1. The Station House Officer, Penuganchiprolu police station Penuganchiprolu, Krishna District 2. The superintendent of Police, Machilipatnam, Krishna District 3. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Home Department Secretariat, Velagapudi Amaravathi, Guntur District 4. Nagamani Alias Revathi, W / o Sudhakar, Aged about 30yrs, R/ o Thotacherla village, Penuganchiprolu mandal, Krishna District ...Respondents . Counsel for the Petitioner: P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 10099 of 2021 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare action of the respondent No.1 in interfering with the matrimonial disputes between the petitioner's family and respondent No.4 by summoning the petitioner and his family members to the police station and harassing them without following due process of law as arbitrary, illegal and violation of Article 22 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No .1 not to interfere with the matrimonial disputes pending between the petitioner's family and respondent No.4 and not to disturb the personal liberty of the petitioner and his family members without following due process of law…” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petition may be disposed of, since the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 08.10.2025 Dvs HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.10099 of 2021 Dated.08.10.2025 Dvs 221