- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41101 WP No. 20783 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.20783 OF 2023 (GM-R/C) BETWEEN: 1. SRI H H KARIGOWDA S/O LATE SRI. HAVALE GOWA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/O OLD HAGARE VILLAGE, HAGARE POST, MADIHALLI HOBLI, BELUR TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 216. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. HARISCHANDRA MOVVAR, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE (MUZARAI) VIDHANA SOUDHA DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU - 560001. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, HASSAN DISTRICT, HASSAN - 573 201. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, SAKELSHAPURA SUBDIVISION, HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 134. Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41101 WP No. 20783 of 2023 4. THE TAHSILDAR BELUR TALUK, BELUR, HASSAN DISTRICT - 572340. 5. SRI. SHIVAIAH, S/O LATE SRI. DEVAIAH ALIAS DYAVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/O MADIHALLI VILLAGE AND POST, MADIHALLI HOBLI, BELURU TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 216. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.2 TO DISMISS THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.5 SEEKING FOR APPOINTMENT UNDER SECTION 9 OF THE KARNATAKA HINDU RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS ACT, 1997 VIDE ANNEXURE -R. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. This petition is listed for 6th time for non- compliance of the office objections. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41101 WP No. 20783 of 2023 Despite having been granted sufficient time, the learned counsel for the petitioner has failed to comply with the office objections. By order dated 10.03.2025, this Court had granted a final opportunity of two weeks time to rectify the said objections. This non-compliance indicates that the petitioner has no genuine intent to diligently pursue the matter. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non- compliance with office objections. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10