APHC010601612023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 31046 OF 2023 Between: 1. NELLURI VAMSI KRISHNA, S/o. Venkata Narayana, Aged about 48 years, Occ. Business, Rio. Door No.26-2-119, Jayakrishna Apartment, 1st Floor, Floor, Ashok Nagar, Guntur, Guntur District. ...Petitioner AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The Inspector General of Police, Guntur Range, Guntur, Guntur District. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Palandu District, Narasaraopet, Erstwhile Guntur District. 4. The Station House Officer, Macharla Rural Police Station, Macharla, Palnadu District, Erstwhile Guntur District. 5. M Samba Siva Rao, S/o not known to the petitioner, Aged about 64 years, Occ. real estate business, R/o. Door No.5-60-2/164, 4/4, Ashok Nagar, Guntur Town, Guntur District. 6. Ashok Kumar Ravinipalli, S/o Aadam, Aged about 24 years, Occ. driver, R/o. Door No.4-4, Lakshmipuram, Ashok Nagar, Guntur Town, Guntur District, presently residing at Gangireddypallem Village, Machavaram mandal, Palnadu district, Erstwhile Guntur District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent involving in civil matters by misusing his official powers is as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Principles of natural justice and violative of Art.21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 211d respondent to conduct departmental enquiry against the 4th respondent as per the G.O.Ms.No.288 / 2010, dated 06-11-2010, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased forthwith direct the 4th respondent not to take any coercive steps against the petitioner's business activities, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: KOTHA LEELA GANESH RAGHAVENDRA Counsel for the Respondents: GANESH PALADUGU Counsel for the Respondents:GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO:31046 of 2023 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: <…to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent involving in civil matters by misusing his official powers is as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Principles of natural justice and violative of Art.21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 211d respondent to conduct departmental enquiry against the 4th respondent as per the G.O.Ms.No.288 / 2010, dated 06-11-2010, and passpass…= 2. Heard Sri Kotha Leela Ganesh Raghavendra, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader is in attendance. 5. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed since the relief has become infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 10.12.2025 KKV THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO:31046 of 2023 Dated 10.12.2025 KKV HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATI MAIN CASE NO.: W.P. No. 31046 of 2023 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. Date ORDER OFFICE NOTE 04. 10.12.2025 Dr.VJP,J The Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. (vide separate order). ________ Dr.VJP, J KKV