Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:51610] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 20081/2025 Ritesh S/o Ramjilal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o House No. 3611/7 Kalimai Road, Nasirabad, Ajmer, Distt. Ajmer (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Local Self Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. The Director Of Local Bodies, Directorate Of Local Self Department, 22 Godam Puliya, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation Ajmer, Distt. Ajmer (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singodiya For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 18/12/2025
1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- (i) May kindly be quashed and set aside the impugned order dated 27.12.2021 as well as
order dated 29.10.2021 by which the candidature of the petitioner for appointment on the compassionate ground has been rejected and the respondents be directed to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment on compassionate ground in place of his deceased brother namely Late Sanju, who died while in service and give him appointment on the suitable post as per his qualification with all consequential benefits.
[2025:RJ-JP:51610] (2 of 2) [CW-20081/2025]
2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents-Authority to consider and resolve his grievances.
3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition.
4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /120