- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38044 WP No. 27190 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO. 27190 OF 2025 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: 1. MR. TIKAM CHAND P. S/O PUNARAM JI AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS R/AT 96/1, KANAKADASA ROAD MADIKERI TOWN, KODAGU-571 201 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAJARAMA S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER CITY MUNICIPAL COUNCIL MADIKERI NEAR KALAKSHETHRA MADIKERI-571 201. …RESPONDENT THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI BY QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER ¸ÀA:ªÀÄ£À¸À/vÁ.±Á/45/2020-21 DATED 23.07.2025 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38044 WP No. 27190 of 2025 ORAL ORDER 1. On the ground that the petitioner has put up construction in violation of sanction plan, the impugned notice is issued by the respondent calling upon the petitioner to show cause as to why action should not be initiated against him. Aggrieved by the same, the present writ petition is filed with a prayer to set aside the impugned notice. 2. I do not see any error in the impugned notice. The allegation made therein is that, it has come to the notice of the respondent that the petitioner has put up construction in violation of sanction plan, hence, notice is issued to him as to why action should not be initiated against him and an opportunity is granted to the petitioner to show cause that he has not put up construction in violation of the plan sanctioned. 3. As the petitioner has failed to make out any ground for interference, the writ petition is hereby dismissed. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE PGG