Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49003 (AP)

TANGELLA SATYANARAYANA v. SMT. TANGELLA ANANTHALAKSHMI & THE STATE OF A.P.

CRLRC/1483/2011 · 2025-05-01

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

• IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1483 OF 2011 Revision filed under Section 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C, against the Order dated 16-06-2011 passed in M.P.No.67 of 2010 in O.P.No.1433 of 2009 on the file of the Additional Family Court at Visakhapatnam. Between: Tangella Satyanarayana, S/o late Tatabbai, Hindu, aged about 31 R/o D.No.6-223, Ravindra Nagar, Old Dairy Farm, years, Visakhapatnam. ...Petitioner AND 1. Smt. Tangella Ananthalakshmi W/o Satyanarayana, Aged about 29 years, R/o D.No.27-5-23, Sundarayya Colony, Peddakantyadi Mandal, Gajuwaka, Visakhapatnam Dist. 2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Public Prosecutor High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravathi. ...Respondents I.A. NO: 1 OF 2011(CRLRCMP. NO: 2150 OF 2011) Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be w r pleased to suspend the operation of the Order dated 16.06.2011 passed'in M.P.No.67 of 2010 in O.P.No.1433 of 2009 on the file of the Addl. Family Odurt at Visakhapatnam, pending disposal of the CrI.R.C. f .. tv- • \ ■ 'i dbunsel for the Petitioner :SRI. A S C BOSE Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : SRI. K SARVA BHOUMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: APJHC010105062011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) SfflB [3521] FRIDAY ,THE SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE \ PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1483/2011 Between: Tangella Satyanarayana ...PETITIONER AND Smt Tangella Ananthalakshmi The State Of A P and Others ...RESPONDENT{S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.AS C BOSE Counsel for the Respondent{S): 1. K SARVA BHOUMA RAO 2.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER: Mr. A.S.C.Bose, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case has become infructuous inasmuch as main O.P.No.1433 of 2009 itself was disposed of by the learned Additional Family Court, Visakhapatnam, on 12.04.2014, as the matter was settled out side of the Court. 2. The case status information also confirms the above submission. w I 2 In view of the above submission, the Criminal Revision Case "is 3. dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. SD/- V SATYANARAYANA DEPUTY REGISTRAR ^ //TRUE COPY// odOFFICER SECTI To, The Additional Family Court at Visakhapatnam.(with records) 1. One CC to Sri. A S C Bose, Advocate [OPUC 2. One CC to Sri. K Sarva Bhouma Rao, Advocate [OPUC 3. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 4. The Section Officer, Criminal Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi. 5. 6. Three CD Copies PR \ w HIGH COURT DATED:02/05/2025 ORDER CRLRC.No.1483 of 2011 DISMISSING THE CRLRC AS INFRUCTUOUS