APHC010171202019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 7391/2019 Between: 1. SHAIK GULZAR BEGUM, W/O LATE SHAIK NAJEER, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, RIO D.NO.20-1-89011, MAIN ROAD, ALANKAR CENTRE, MULAPETA, NELLORE CITY. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS. VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT AT NELLORE. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, VEDAYAPALEM/V TOWN POLICE STATION, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 5. DR KANDALA VANI, W/O GIDDALURU SUBBARAO, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, RIO DOOR NO.20-1075/6, R.K.NAGAR, KADAPA. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent in interfering into the civil disputes and harassing the petitioner and her family members by calling the petitioner to the police station as illegal, arbitrary and is in violation of the constitutional guarantees of the petitioner under Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th respondent not to interfere with the personal liberty of the petitioner including her family members by summoning them to the police station in unconnected crimes IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th respondent not to harass the petitioner and her family members by summoning them to the Police Station pertaining to unconnected crimes, pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PAMARTHI KAMESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. ANUP KOUSHIK KARAVADI The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.7391 OF 2019 ORDER: Sri T.Venkata Manoj, learned counsel representing Sri Pamarthi Kameswara Rao, learned counsel for the writ petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication, and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 2. Sri R.Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 10.12.2025 Pmk 4 14 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:7391 OF 2019 Date: 10.12.2025 Pmk