Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49002 (ALL)

SHERDEEN AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

A482/9862/2016 · 2025-05-21

Prashant Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:87454 Court No. - 87 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9862 of 2016 Applicant :- Sherdeen And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Himkanya Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Pandey Balkrishna,Syed Ali Imam Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J. 1. None appeared on behalf of the applicants to press this application even in the revised reading of cause list. Learned A.G.A. for the State as well as Sri S.A. Imam, learned counsel for O.P. no.2 are present. 2. The instant applicant has been filed way back in the year 2016. It appears that by efflux of time either the applicant has lost interest in the matter or the instant application has rendered infructuous, and that is why no one has appeared on behalf of the applicants to press this application. 3. Accordingly, the instant application is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 4. However, in case the cause for filing the instant application is still surviving, the applicants will be at liberty to file restoration application in the instant matter. Order Date :- 22.5.2025 Manish Himwan Digitally signed by :- MANISH HIMWAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad