[2025:RJ-JP:51274] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19727/2025 Kailash Chandra S/o Shri R.d. Gupta, Aged About 79 Years, R/o A-107, Ok Plus, Venus, Mahal Road, Behind Petrol Pump, Jagatpura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. National Bank For Agriculture And Rural Development (Nabard), Head Office, Bandra Kurla Complex, Mumbai Through Its Chairman. 2. The Chief General Manager (Hrmd), National Bank For Agriculture And Rural Development Head Office, Mumbai. 3. The Chief General Manager, Nabard Regional Office, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Khushal Singh Rathore For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 17/12/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “a) an By appropriate writ, direction in order and thereof the the nature respondents may be directed include name of the petitioner in the RBI list and extend benefit of pension updation to the petitioner and pay arrear of pension updation along with 12% interest from due date to the date of actual payment.” 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file [2025:RJ-JP:51274] (2 of 2) [CW-19727/2025] an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /110