GHAMAND SINGH S/O SHRI AMARJEET SINGH v. MADANLAL S/O MUNSHIRAM
CFA/425/2024 · 2025-10-16
Sudesh Bansal
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48998 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48998 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:42508] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 425/2024
1. Ghamand Singh S/o Shri Amarjeet Singh, R/o Village Garh Teski, Tehsil Nagar, Distt. Bharatpur (Raj.)
2. Banjar Singh S/o Shri Gajjan Singh, R/o Nearby Bijlighar, Ramgarh, Distt. Alwar (Raj.) ----Appellants/Plaintiffs Versus
1. Madanlal S/o Munshiram, R/o Village Lalawandi, Tehsil Ramgarh, Distt. Alwar (Raj.)
2. Rakesh S/o Madanlal, R/o Village Lalawandi, Tehsil Ramgarh, Distt. Alwar (Raj.)
3. Pintu S/o Madanlal, R/o Village Lalawandi, Tehsil Ramgarh, Distt. Alwar (Raj.)
4. Kanta D/o Madanlal, R/o Village Lalawandi, Tehsil Ramgarh, Distt. Alwar (Raj.)
5. Rekha D/o Madanlal, R/o Village Lalawandi, Tehsil Ramgarh, Distt. Alwar (Raj.)
6. Sunita D/o Madanlal, R/o Village Lalawandi, Tehsil Ramgarh, Distt. Alwar (Raj.)
7. Ashish Kapoor S/o Late Shri Kailash Chand, R/o Village Nauganwa, Tehsil Nauganwa, Distt. Alwar (Raj.)
8. Shubham Kapoor S/o Late Shri Kailash Chand, R/o Village Nauganwa, Tehsil Nauganwa, Distt. Alwar (Raj.)
9. Sudeep Mittal S/o Pradeep Mittal, R/o Village Ramgarh, Tehsil Ramgarh, Distt. Alwar (Raj.) ----Respondents/Defendants For Appellant(s) : Mr. Hemendra Goyal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Abhi Goyal HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order 16/10/2025
1. This is plaintiffs’ first appeal against rejection of their civil suit for specific performance and partition vide order dated 22.02.2024 passed by the Additional District Judge No.1, Alwar in
[2025:RJ-JP:42508] (2 of 2) [CFA-425/2024] the application filed under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC by the respondents-defendants.
2. Counsel for appellants-plaintiffs submits that during course of appeal, parties have entered into compromise and plaintiffs have left their rights and interest in the land in question and has received advance consideration paid by them back, hence, in that view, appellants do not want to pursue the appeal and seek permission to withdraw the same.
3. Counsel appearing on behalf of respondents-defendants does not have any objection in withdrawing the first appeal.
4. In view of above, first appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
5. The Court fees paid by the appellants in this first appeal is
directed to be refunded to the appellants and the Registrar (Judicial) may issue certificate to refund the Court fees to the appellants.
6. Stay application and other pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J NITIN /29