Research › Search › Judgment
Bombay High Court · body
2025 DAILYLAW 48993 (BOM)
LALITKUMAR PURSHOTTAMDAS MOHTA v. OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR AND ANR
CAL/157/2003 · 2025-06-20
Shri Anil L Pansare
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48993 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48993 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 cal 8.04 & 157.03.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR. Company Application (CAL) No. 8 of 2004 [Lalitkumar Purushottamdas Mohta vs. The Official Liquidator and ors.] with Company Application (CAL) No. 157 of 2003 [Lalitkumar Purushottamdas Mohta vs. The Official Liquidator and anr.] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. Shriniwas V. Deshpande, Advocate for the Official Liquidator with Mr. Deepak Persoya, Official Liquidator CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE J.
DATED : 20-06
-2025
None for the applicant. The Official Liquidator is present. He submits that because of subsequent developments, he is not pressing for orders. The proceedings are disposed of as not pressed for orders. (Anil L. Pansare, J.) wasnik 2025:BHC-NAG:5710