Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4899 (BOM)

DNYANDEO WAMAN CHOUDHARI v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR AND OTHERS

WP/1568/2025 · 2025-02-03

Shri Mangesh S Patil, Shri Prafulla S Khubalkar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 38 WRIT PETITION NO. 1568 OF 2025 DNYANDEO WAMAN CHOUDHARI VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR AND OTHERS Mr.V.Y.Patil, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.R.K.Ingole, AGP for the respondent/State. ( CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL AND PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, JJ. ) DATE : FEBRUARY 3, 2025 PER COURT : 1. Though the petitioner is claiming monetary benefits pursuant to the employment. He is already armed with the order of esteemed Single Judge dated 17.03.2022 in WP No.2949/2003. He has also preferred a contempt proceeding for failure of the respondents to act in terms of the directions in that writ petition. 2. While the contempt petition is still pending, he has preferred the present writ petition soliciting a writ of mandamus for the relief in the form of payment of his arrears of salary/wages. No such khs/Feb.2025/1568 2025:BHC-AUG:3141-DB - 2 - writ of mandamus in another writ petition can be issued. The petitioner has his remedies in the form of the contempt proceeding, which is still pending. 3. The petition is disposed of accordingly. ( PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.) ( MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) khs/Feb.2025/1568