Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48989 (AP)

Mohansundaram Swetha v. Union of India

WP/37133/2018 · 2025-12-02

Sumathi Jagadam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010767372018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 37113/2018 Between: 1. MOHANSUNDARAM VENKATACHALAM VINOD, S/O. KUMARAPURAM VENKATACHALAM MOHANSUNDARAM, 6-7-639, SRIPURAM COLONY, K.T. ROAD, TIRUPATI - 517501 ...PETITIONER AND 1. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS, SHASTRI BHAWAN, DR.RAJENDRA PRASAD ROAD, NEW DELHI - 110001 2. REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES, ANDHRA PRADESH HYDERABAD, 2ND FLOOR, CORPOARTE BHAWAN, GSI POST, TATTIANARAM NAGOLE, BANDLAGUDA, HYDERABAD - 500 068 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ order or orders more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring that the list of directors placed by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) on its website i.e. www.mca.gov.in as arbitrary illegal without jurisdiction contrary of the provisions of the Companies Act 2013 and Rule 11 of the Companies (Appointment of Directors) Rules 2014 violative of the principles of natural justice besides violating the Petitioners rights guaranteed under Article 14 and Article 19 (1) (g) of the Constitution of India and quash / set-aside the same to the extent it declares / treats the Petitioner as disqualified in terms of Section 164 (2) (a) of the 2 JS,J W.P.No.37113/2018 Companies Act 2013 in the interest of justice that the Petitioner is not disqualified in terms of Section 164 (2) (a) of the Companies Act 2013 or directing the Respondent Nos 1 and 2 to restore the DIN numbers 01974302 of the Petitioner and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents herein to permit Petitioner to get reappointed as Director of any Company or appointed as Director in any company without any hindrance, pending disposal of the main writ petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of the operation of the Impugned order passed by the 2nd Respondent which was uploaded in the website of the 1st Respondent in so far as the petitioner herein is concerned pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T V P SAI VIHARI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA 3 JS,J W.P.No.37113/2018 The Court made the following ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by virtue of the interim order passed by this Court on 07.03.2019, the DIN number of the petitioner was restored. Hence, no further orders are required in the writ petition. Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition stands closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 03.12.2025 KAS 4 JS,J W.P.No.37113/2018 249 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 37113/2018 Date: 03.12.2025 KAS