Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48986 (RAJ)

SANTOSH JAIN SON OF LATE SHRI MANAK CHAND JAIN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/17819/2025 · 2025-11-20

Sanjeet Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:46937] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17819/2025 Santosh Jain Son Of Late Shri Manak Chand Jain, Aged About 57 Years, Resident Of House No. 261, Haribhau Upadhyay Nagar (Main), Ajmer- 305004. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Ayurved, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. State Information Commissioner, Rajasthan State Information Commission, Jhalana Link Road, O.t.s. Crossing, Jln Marg, Jaipur. 3. Director, Department Of Ayurved, Government Of Rajasthan, Directorate, Ajmer. 4. Additional Director, Department Of Ayurved, First Phase, F-75, M.I.A, 1St Phase, Basni, Jodhpur- 342005. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT Order 20/11/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner makes a limited prayer that the second appeal as provided under Section 19 of the Right to Information Act, though file in time and the details of the same have been informed to the Registrar, Rajasthan State Public Information Commission on 01.06.2025 (Annexure-13). Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the same has not been taken into account by the respondent No.2 and no formal order for [2025:RJ-JP:46937] (2 of 2) [CW-17819/2025] deciding the petitioner’s second appeal has been passed. However, the status of the same has been shown as time barred. Counsel for the petitioner further submits that the second appeal is pending before the respondent No.2 since January, 2025 but no effective proceedings has been undertaken by the respondent No.2. The limited prayer made by the counsel for the petitioner for expeditious disposal of the second appeal deserves acceptance. Respondent No.2 is directed to consider and decide the second appeal so filed by the petitioner as expeditiously as possible and to pass final order preferably within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of this order, while taking into account the communication dated 01.06.2025 (Annexure-13) so filed by the petitioner. Writ petition is disposed of accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (SANJEET PUROHIT),J AVINASH GULERIA /42