Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48978 (PNJ)

SAHIB SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

CRM-M/25101/2024 · 2025-04-02

Sandeep Moudgil

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

309 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-25101-2024 DECIDED ON: 02.04.2025 SAHIB SINGH .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER .....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. G.S. Bhatia, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. J.S. Rattu, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Banga, Advocate for respondent No.2. SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) The jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been invoked seeking quashing of FIR No. 203, dated 28.07.2004, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 506 and 120-B IPC, registered at Police Station Jandiala, Amritsar Rural, on the basis of compromise dated 11.02.2024 (Annexure P-3) along-with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom. Despite issuance of notice of motion in the matter on 20.05.2024, the matter is not proceeded further. Since there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner for the last three consecutive dates continuously. Today again request has been made to adjourn the matter wherein, a prayer is for quashing the FIR No. 203, dated 28.07.2004, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 506 and 120-B IPC, registered at Police Station Jandiala, Amritsar Rural, on the basis of compromise dated 11.02.2024 (Annexure P-3) along-with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom. SHAM SUNDER 2025.04.04 17:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-25101-2024 -2- In the light of above stated circumstance, this Court is of the view that either the compromise has not been affected between the parties or parties are not ready to give their statements qua that effect or otherwise. Hence, no fruitful purpose would be served by continuing the present petition. Accordingly, the present petition is dismised. However, parties are at liberty to approach this Court as and when they are satisfied, ready and willing to act upon the compromise. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 02.04.2025 JUDGE Sham Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No SHAM SUNDER 2025.04.04 17:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document