[2025:RJ-JP:50434] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18677/2025 Juber Khan S/o Sumer Khan, Aged About 43 Years, Resident Of Kaithwara Tehsil Pahari, District Deeg (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Chief Engineer (Rural), Public Health Engineering Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. Joint Secretary (I), Public Health Engineering Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Neeraj Batra, GC Mr. Aaditya Godara, AAAG for Ms. Mahi Yadav, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 15/12/2025 1. Mr. Neeraj Batra, GC accepts notice on behalf of respondent(s). 2. Learned counsel for petitioner is directed to supply them a copy of petition and Office is directed to reflect name of Mr. Neeraj Batra, GC as counsel for respondent(s). 3. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “It is, therefore, humbly prayed that the Hon'ble Court may kindly accept and allow this writ petitions call for and examine entire record of the case and [2025:RJ-JP:50434] (2 of 3) [CW-18677/2025] (i ) By an appropriate writ, order of direction in the nature thereof the respondents may kindly be directed to treated the service of the petitioner as other pump operator and allow him to join in his place of posting as per law and further implement the order dated 5.4.2023 (Annex. -3) and give the name of post of petitioners as Assistant Pump Driver an also pay salary to the petitioner in the regular pay scale of Assistant Pump Driver with all consequential benefit. (ii) By an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof the respondents may further be to regularize the directed service of petitioner on the post of Assistant Pump Driver looking to their long experience with all consequential (iii) Issue any other writ order or direction, which this Hon' ble court deems fit and proper, may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner. (iv) Cost of writ petition also may kindly be awarded in favour of petitioners.” 4. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents-Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 5. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period [2025:RJ-JP:50434] (3 of 3) [CW-18677/2025] of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /18