[2025:RJ-JP:47573] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17899/2025 1. Hemendra Kumar Verma S/o Batti Lal Jatav, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Village Ghurakar, Post Khohri, Tehsil Karauli, District Karauli, Rajasthan. 2. Babu Lal Verma S/o Brij Lal, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Balai Mohalla, Govindgarh, Alwar, Rajasthan. 3. Lokesh Kumar S/o Mahendra Singh, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Village Nagla Saih, Post Malah, Tehsil And District Bharatpur, Rajasthan. 4. Vidyadhar S/o Banwari Lal, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Gowala, Chirawa, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. 5. Dharm Kumar Ratawal S/o Pooran Mal Ratawal, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village Balesar, Post Navrangpura, Tehsil Virat Nagar, District Kotputli-Behror, Rajasthan. 6. Narendra Kumar Harijan S/o Shyam Lal Harijan, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Ward No. 06, Harijan Basti, Kishangarh Renwal, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 7. Ashok Kumar S/o Chhotu Ram, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Vpo Khuiyala, District Jaisalmer, Rajasthan. 8. Omprakash Meghwal S/o Rawat Ram Meghwal, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Vpo Haddan, Tehsil Kolayat, District Bikaner, Rajasthan. 9. Ramesh Kumar S/o Tulchha Ram, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Near Gusai Temple, Indra Colony, Phalodi, Rajasthan. 10. Prakash Kumar Megval S/o Tulsa Ram, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village Mailawas, Post Hemaguda, Tehsil Chitalwana, District Jalore, Rajasthan. 11. Tulchha Ram S/o Raghu Ram, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Village Balasar, Post Bhainsara, Tehsil Pokran, District Jaisalmer, Rajasthan. 12. Rajender Kumar S/o Imi Chand, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Vpo Nukera, Tehsil Sangria, District Hanumangarh, Rajasthan. 13. Ramesh Pindyar S/o Shankar Lal, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Himmat Nagar, Tilanes, Nagaur, Rajasthan. 14. Ram Prasad S/o Indra Chand, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Village Jodi Patta, Lohsana, Churu, Rajasthan. [2025:RJ-JP:47573] (2 of 4) [CW-17899/2025] 15. Madan Lal S/o Taru Ram, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Golu Walal Sihagan, Hanumangarh, Rajasthan. 16. Raja Ram S/o Asha Ram, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Vpo Phoole Ji (Arjansar), Tehsil Loonkaransar, District Bikaner, Rajasthan. 17. Vinod Kumar S/o Kalu Ram, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Ward No. 2, Modhu Nagar, Tehsil Rawatsar, District Hanumangarh, Rajasthan. 18. Devi Lal S/o Mohan Lal, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Vpo Badanu, Tehsil Jasrasar, District Bikaner, Rajasthan. 19. Vinod Kumar S/o Tajoo Ram Meghwal, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Ward No. 3, Village Rodawali, Tehsil And District Hanumangarh, Rajasthan. 20. Sheo Prakash S/o Sultan Ram, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Ward No. 03, Suranwali, 7 Hdp, Hanumangarh, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, School Education, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner. 3. Rambhajan Bairwa (Seniority No. 8782), Through Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini with Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG with Mr. Vishal Kumar and Ms. Pooja Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 21/11/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayer:- [2025:RJ-JP:47573] (3 of 4) [CW-17899/2025] “i) Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby the respondents may kindly be directed to promote the petitioners on the post of Vice Principal under SC Male Category w.e.f. 27.09.2025 i.e. the date on which the junior candidates have been given promotion. ii) Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby Respondents may kindly be directed to call the petitioners in the counseling for promotion to the post of Vice Principal in compliance of order dated 13.10.2025 and allow the petitioners to continue serve duties at the present place of posting on the post of Vice Principal in compliance of order dated 29.09.2025. iii) Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby the action of the Respondents may kindly be declared illegal by which they have given promotion to the junior candidates and depriving the petitioners for promotion. iv) Pass any other appropriate order which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case in favour of the petitioners.” 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioners submits that the petitioners may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve their grievances. [2025:RJ-JP:47573] (4 of 4) [CW-17899/2025] 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioners are given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioners but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioners either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioners have provided E-mail in their representation. If the petitioners are still aggrieved, they are at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/110