RISHIKESH S/O SHRI PITAM SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/15191/2025 · 2025-11-21
Sameer Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48973 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48973 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:47086] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15191/2025 Rishikesh S/o Shri Pitam Singh, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Village Parsoda, Thana Mania, District Dholpur (Raj.) (Accused Presently Confined In District Jail Dholpur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Neeraj Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order 21/11/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 479/2025 registered at Police Station Maniya District Dholpur for the offence(s) under Sections 3(1)/25(1)(b) of Arms Act.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the applicant is sole bread earner of the family, aged approximately 34 years. It is submitted that complainant i.e. police officer was on surveillance and he caught two persons red- handed in possession of arms and ammunition. It is fairly contended that there are three criminal antecedents registered under State Excise Act and one antecedent was registered under Arms Act, against the applicant. It is submitted that applicant is in custody ever since 05.11.2025. Learned counsel for the applicant has given undertaking that applicant will not possess any weapon
[2025:RJ-JP:47086] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-15191/2025] without appropriate license, and if he has any such weapon, the same shall be surrendered, with the police authorities.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
4. Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties, considering that accused-applicant is sole bread earner of the family; that accused-applicant is in custody ever since 05.11.2025; that undertaking given by the counsel for the accused-applicant that the applicant shall restrain himself from use of any arms or weapons and if he has any un-licensed weapon, he shall surrender the same and looking to the overall
facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicant and enlarge him on bail.
5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Rishikesh S/o Shri Pitam Singh shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.
6. It is made clear that in future, if any illegal weapon or any sort of such ammunition is used/possessed, then bail granted shall automatically stands dismissed/revoked.
(SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /182