APHC010038812019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI MONDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 16Q OF 2019 Revision filed under Sections 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C., aggrieved by the judgment dated 08.10.2018 passed in Crl.A. No.269 of 2018 on the file of the Sessions Judge, Mahila Court. Visakhapatnam modifying the orders passed in Crl.M.P.No. 3350 of 2017 in D.V.C. No. 09 of 2015 dated 23.03.2018 on the file of the IV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Visakhapatnam. Between: Vandavasi Asha Kumar, S/o. Vandavasi Gunasekhar R/o. D.No.11-22, S.V. Nagar, M.R.Peta, Town, Chittoor District. Aged 43 Years, Mutyalareddypalle, Tirupathi ...Petitioner/Respondent/Appellant AND 1. Smt.Talari Leema (Vandavasi) T.Yesupadam, aged 33 years, presently residing 0pp. To Venkateswara Apartment, Near Krishna W/o. A.Asha Kumar, at D.No. 53-17-52/12, College, P & T Colony, D/o. Maddilapalem, Visakhapatnam. 2. Sophia, IDA Scudder, D/o. V.Asha Kumar her mother Natural Guardian Smt. Leela. aged 4 years, Minor, Rep. by 3. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. at Amaravathi. ...Respondents/Petitioners/Respondents [A NO: 2 OF 201 g Pet,t,on under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings including the execution of the judgment passed in CrI.A. No.269 of 2018 dated 08.10.2018 on the file of the Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Visakhapatnam criminal revision case. pending disposal of the main Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri K.Mohan Counsel for Respondent No.1 & 2: - Counsel for Respondent No.3: The Public The Court made the following order: Rami Reddy, Advocate Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. APHC010038812019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] li; MONDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 160/2019 Between: V.asha Kumar ...PETITIONER AND T Leema and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.K MOHAN RAMI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2. The Court made the following: / /' 2 JUDGMENT! This Criminal Revision Case has been filed and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure under Sections 397 1973, by the revision petitioner challenging the judgment dated 08.10.2018 in Criminal Appeal No. 269 of 2018 Mahila Court, Visakhapatnam. on the file of the Court of learned Sessions Judge 2. Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, both learned counsel would submit that the petitioner-husband and wife have mutually agreed to live that effect and that therefore the infructuous. respondent No. 1- separately and obtained a decree to criminal revision case has become 3. In the light of the above, the criminal revision case is dismissed as infructuous. Pending miscellaneous dismissed in consequence. applications, if any, shall stand Sd/- K TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam //TRUE COPY// To, T The Sessions District, (with records) 2- IV Additional Judge, Mahila Court, Chief Metropolitan Magistrate records) Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam District, (with 3. One CC to Sri K.Mohan 4. Two CC Rami Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] s to the Public Prosecutor, High Court 5. The Section Officer, of A.P. [OUT] Criminal Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. 6. Three CD Copies GPC sree V ▼ \ HIGH COURT DATED: 18/08/2025 ORDER CRLRC NO. 160 OF 2019 nt Section^/^ DISMISSING THIS CRIMINAL REVISION CASE AS INFRUCTUOUS