Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48969 (AP)

G. Sunitha, W/o. P. Sai Ragghav, v. The Regional Passport Office,

WP/43443/2016 · 2025-09-22

Sumathi Jagadam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010711592016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 43443/2016 Between: 1. G. SUNITHA, W/O. P. SAI RAGGHAV,, OCC: HOUSE WIFE, R/O. FLAT NO. 20, EMARALD ATRIUM, SIRIPURAM, VISAHAPATNAM- 03, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICE, VISAKHAPATNAM, REP. BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER. 2. PARASA SAI RAGHAV S/O PARASA CHANDRA SEKHAR, OCC: EMPLOYEE, 2700 COLORDO AVENUE, SANTA MONICA, CA-90404, USA (ABSCOND). PERMANENT RESIDENT OF R/O. D. NO. 38-15-4, PARASA COLONY, OPP. BSNL COMPLEX, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. PARASA CHANDRA SEKHAR S/O LATE RAMALINGESWARA RAO, OCC: DOCTOR, R/O. D. NO. 3B-15-4, PARASA COLONY, OPP. BSNL COMPLEX, ELURU, W. G. DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. PARASA SOBHA RANI W/O PARASA CHANDRA SEKHAR, OCC: HOUSE WIFE, R/O. D. NO. 3B-15-4, PARASA COLONY, OPP. BSNL COMPLEX, ELURU, W.G. DISTRICT. ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or direction, particularly one in the nature 2 JS,J W.P.No.43443/2016 of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the inaction of the 1st respondent to impound the passport of the respondent No. 2 to 4 i.e., 1) 2nd Respondent (Parasa Sai Raghav) Passport Bearing No. H0998927, 2) 3rd Respondent (Parasa Chandra Sekhar) Passport Bearing No. H2471333, 3) 4th Respondent (Parasa Shobha Rani) Passport Bearing No. H2949449 in pursuant the letter dated 27.04.2015 issued by the I Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, VisakImpalnam with immediate effect and direct the Respondent No.1 to take necessary action for impounding of the passports of the Respondents 2 to 4 IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 53620 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents No. 3 & 4 not to leave the country pending disposal of criminal proceedings while consideration of the letter dated 27.04.2015 issued by the I Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakhapatnam to impound the passports by the 1st respondent IA NO: 4 OF 2016(WPMP 236061 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V BALRAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. KEERTHI KIRAN KOTA 2. G RUKMINI (SC FOR CENTRAL GOVT) 3 JS,J W.P.No.43443/2016 The Court made the following ORDER: No representation for the petitioner. On the earlier occasions also i.e., on 13.08.2025, 03.09.2025 and 16.09.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “for dismissal”. Even today there is no representation for the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the case. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed as non-prosecution. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 23.09.2025 KAS 4 JS,J W.P.No.43443/2016 571 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 43443/2016 Date: 23.09.2025 KAS