Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48966 (RAJ)

SMT. KHUSHBOO W/O SH. SURENDRA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/11087/2025 · 2025-11-01

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:43817] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11087/2025 Smt. Khushboo W/o Sh. Surendra, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Bhapar, Police Station Surajgarh, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Is Confined In District Jail, Jhunjhunu). ----Accused-Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Non-Applicant For Applicant(s) : Mr. Arun Singh Shekhawat For Non-Applicant(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Ashvin Garg HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 01/11/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 249/2024 registered at Police Station Surajgarh District Jhunjhunu for the offence(s) under Section 124(1) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard and considered the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the applicant, the objections raised by the learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the non- applicant, and perused the material available on record. 3. Considering that there are three antecedents registered against the applicant; that she is alleged for throwing acid upon the victim in question, on account of which the medical report and the status which as suggested by the counsel for the complainant, [2025:RJ-JP:43817] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-11087/2025] that till date the victim (who was serving in army) is hospitalized and irreparable loss has been caused to his vision and face; that if conviction is ordered, the matter is equivalent to heinous, and punishment for life imprisonment is prescribed; that on earlier occasion, bail cancellation application was allowed by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 12.03.2025 and taking note of the overall circumstances, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the accused-applicant on bail at this stage, who is stated to be married lady with a child. 4. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is dismissed, at this stage. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/16