JAMIL QUARESHI @ BEVDA S/O LATE SH. NANHA @ DHANNA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/13556/2025 · 2025-10-31
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48965 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48965 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13556/2025
1. Jamil Quareshi @ Bevda S/o Late Sh. Nanha @ Dhanna, Aged About 70 Years, R/o House No. 2/140, Azad Nagar, Police Station Transport Nagar, District Jaipur East, At Present Karim Nagar, Talai Gamer Road, Police Station Kho Nagoriyan, At Present Behind Aksa Maszid Kho Nagoriyan, Police Station Kho Nagoriyan, District Jaipur East (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Ajmer).
2. Nasir @ Nasu S/o Jamil Quareshi @ Bevda, Aged About 32 Years, R/o House No. 2/140, Azad Nagar, Police Station Transport Nagar, District Jaipur East, At Present Karim Nagar, Talai Gamer Road, Police Station Kho Nagoriyan, At Present Behind Aksa Maszid Kho Nagoriyan, Police Station Kho Nagoriyan, District Jaipur East (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Ajmer). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohammed Zubeir For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 31/10/2025
1. The petitioners have preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.188/2025 registered at Police Station Bhinai, District-Ajmer for offences under Section 303(2) of BNS, 2023.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-13556/2025]
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submitted that the allegation against the present petitioners pertains to stealing the ornaments from the complainant’s shop. Petitioners are behind the bars since 11.08.2025. Charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, hence, the bail application of the petitioners may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioners-Jamil Quareshi @ Bevda S/o Late Sh. Nanha @ Dhanna and Nasir @ Nasu S/o Jamil Quareshi @ Bevda be released on bail provided they furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial with following further conditions:- (i) that the petitioners shall mark their presence before the SHO, Police Station Bhinai District Ajmer in every 15 days of each month till conclusion of trial.
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-13556/2025] (ii) The concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register for this purpose. In case, the petitioners fails to mark their presence in the concerned Police Station as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to trial court in this regard. (iii) If breach of any of the directions is reported or come to the notice of the trial court the same shall alone be a reason for learned Public Prosecutor to apply for cancellation of bail.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/207