1 2025:CGHC:52962 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8442 of 2018 1 - Likhmat Das S/o Bhajan Lal Sahu Aged About 39 Years Working As State Accountant, National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme Chhattisgarh, National Health Mission Chhattisgarh Iv Th Floor, Chhattisgarh Housing Board, Commercial Compolex, Sector-27, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Union Of India Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Health And Family Welfare, Nirman Bhawan, Near Udyog Bhawan, Metro Station, Maulana Azad Road, New Delhi-110011., District : New Delhi, Delhi 2 - National Health Mission Chhattisgarh, Through Its State Secretary, Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Room No. S4-10, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Mission Director National Health Mission Chhattisgarh, Ivth Floor, Chhattisgarh Housing Board, Commercial Complex, Sector- 27, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Nigam, Advocate For respondent No.1 : Ms. Anmol Sharma, Advocate For Respondents No.2 & 3 : Mr. C. J. K. Rao, Advocate (Hon’ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput) Order on Board 30/10/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking following relief:- 2 10.1 a writ and/or an order in the nature of writ of appropriate nature directing the respondents to pay the petitioner remuneration & other emoluments, as approved by the Central Government for the post of Accountant from time to time under the National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme, Chhattisgarh; 10.2 a writ and/or an order in the nature of writ of mandamus/ appropriate nature directing respondent authorities to grant arrears of salary to the petitioner, which arose on account of disparity in the pay-scale w.e.f. August 2014. 10.3 grant any other relief/ interim order/ direction/observation in favour of the petitioner, which Hon'ble Court thinks fit and proper in the interest of justice & equity. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, to redress the grievances projected in the writ petition, the ends of justice would be served if the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to respondents No.2 & 3 and they are directed to decide the same in an objective manner within a reasonable period of time. 3. This preposition is not opposed by learned counsel for the respondents. 4. In view of the above, the instant petition is disposed of, permitting the petitioner to make a fresh representation to respondents No.2 & 3 within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. Upon such representation having been made, the respondents No. 2 & 3 shall decide the same in an objective manner within a further period of 120 days after giving a personal hearing to the petitioner, from the date of receipt of the representation. 6. With the above observation, the writ petition is finally disposed of. 7. This Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. 8. No order as to costs. Sd/- (Sachin Singh Rajput) JUDGE Parul PARUL MITTAL Digitally signed by PARUL MITTAL Date: 2025.11.03 16:44:46 +0530