IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JUNE 2025 BEFORE THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 539 OF 2022 BETWEEN 1 . SRI PARASHURAM, S/O D. MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, 2 . SMT. RENUKA, D/O D. MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, 3 . SMT. SHAILA, D/O D. MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT THIMMANAYAKANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, MALUR TALUK. 4 . SIR MUNIRAJU, D/O D. MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, 5 . SMT. LAKSHMI, D/O D. MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, …2 RSA NO.539/2022 2 R/AT ALAMBADI VILLAGE, LAKKUR HOBLI, MALUR TALUK. 6 . SMT. JYOTHI, D/O D. MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, 7 . SMT. NAGAMMA, D/O D. MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, APPELLANT NOS. 1, 2, 4, 6, AND 7 ARE RESIDING AT NAGONDANAHALLI VILLAGE, LAKKUR HOBLI, MALUR TALUK ...APPELLANT/S (By Sri./Smt : C. V. ANNAIAH AND CHANDRASHEKAR, ADVOCATES) AND 1 . SRI S. M. ASHOK, S/O LATE VENKATAMMA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, SAMPANGERE VILLAGE, LAKKUR HOBLI, MALUR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT. …3 RSA NO.539/2022 3 2 . SMT. VARALAKSHMI, D/O LATE VENKATAMMA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, 3 . SMT. HEMAVATHI, D/O LATE VENKATAMMA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/O DYAPASANDRA VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, MALUR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT. 4 . SMT. PAPANNA, S/O DODDANNA, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, R/O JAYAMANGAL VILLAGE, LAKKUR HOBLI, MALUR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT. 5 . SMT. MUNIYAMMA, D/O DODDANNA, AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS, M. HOSAHALLI VILLAGE, MATHI HOBLI, MALUR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT. …4 RSA NO.539/2022 4 6 . SRI NARAYANAPPA, S/O DODDANNA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, JAYAMANGAL VILLAGE, LAKKUR HOBLI, MALUR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT. 7 . SRI CHANDRAPPA, S/O GAGAMMA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O NAGONDANAHALLI VILLAGE, LAKKUR HOBLI, MALUR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT. …RESPONDENT/S REGULAR SECOND APPEAL FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 27.08.2020 PASSED IN RA.No.69/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KOLAR, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 28.02.2018 PASSED IN OS No.142/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MALUR. This Regular Second Appeal coming on for Orders, this day the Court made the following Order:- …5 RSA NO.539/2022 5 ORAL ORDER This appeal is filed on 28.03.2022 and office has raised 10 objections. The matter is listed before the Registrar on 01.04.2022 and counsel was absent, no representation and again matter listed before the Court on 11.10.2023 and counsel sought two weeks time and even after lapse of 2 years, none of office objections are complied. Hence, on cost of Rs.1,000/- payable at the Registry, another two weeks time is granted. If office objections are not complied and not paid the cost, appeal will be dismissed without reference to bench. Sd/- JUDGE NOTE : Vide Court Order dated 17.06.2025, the office objections are not complied with. Hence, the appeal is hereby dismissed. COPY Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By: SR R By: VS C By: GS Ty Date: 28.11.2025 C Date: 04.12.2025