BHAGYASHREE MEENA W/O OMPRAKASH MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/1294/2025 · 2025-02-06
Ganesh Ram Meena
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4896 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4896 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:5415] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1294/2025 Bhagyashree Meena W/o Omprakash Meena, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Nandu Ka Pura, Ajijpur, Toda Bhim, District Karauli, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Laxman Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order 06/02/2025
1. Petitioner has filed the present anticipatory bail application under Section 482 B.N.S.S. arising out of F.I.R. No.624/2023 registered with the Police Station, Bajaj Nagar, District Jaipur City (East) for offence under Sections 454, 380 & 427 of IPC.
2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused petitioner is a woman and she has falsely been implicated in this case. It is also submitted that co-accused Bharat Singh S/o Raju Lal Meena was arrested, but, no recovery has been effected from his instance. Counsel further submits that no purpose will be served in sending the present accused petitioner in police custody, therefore, he may be extended the benefit of anticipatory bail.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the anticipatory bail application.
4. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor.
[2025:RJ-JP:5415] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1294/2025]
5. Taking into consideration the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner, so also the nature of allegations levelled against the petitioner and more particularly the fact that the petitioner is a woman and the law also says that the case of women should be placed on different footings, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to extend benefit of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
6. The Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed. The S.H.O./I.O./Arresting Authority, Police Station Bajaj Nagar, District Jaipur City (East) in F.I.R. No.624/2023 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner, she shall be released on bail, provided she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to his satisfaction on the following conditions:- (I). that the petitioner shall make herself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii). that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the
facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any police officer, and (iii). that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /20