[2025:RJ-JP:49161] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16948/2025 Rajveer Tyagi S/o Shri Babulal Tyagi, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Village Luhari, Post Sanda, Tehsil And District Dholpur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Transport Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Managing Director, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, (Head Office), Jaipur. 3. Executive Director (Administrative), Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, (Head Office), Chomu House, Near Civil Lines Railway Pathak, Jaipur. 4. Executive Director (Traffic), Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation (Head Office), Chomu House, Near Civil Lines Railway Phatak, Jaipur. 5. Chief Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Dholpur Depot, Dholpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Singhal For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 02/12/2025 1. Defect(s) pointed out by the Office are over-ruled. 2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “It is, therefore, prayed that this writ petition may kindly be accepted and allowed and by an appropriate writ, order or direction, the impugned charge-sheet dated 10.09.2024 (Annexure-11) and recovery of amount from the salary of the petitioner of Rs.8818/- [2025:RJ-JP:49161] (2 of 3) [CW-16948/2025] (Annexure-13) may kindly be quashed and set aside and respondents may kindly be directed to refund the recovered amount of Rs.8818/- to the petitioner with interest in the the interest of justice. (ii) Any other appropriate order or direction, which this Hon’ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts of the present case, may also be passed in favour of the petitioner.” 3. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner while placing reliance upon order dated 23.09.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9950/2025 Jitendra Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. and order dated 17.10.2025 in SB CWP No.14367/2025 titled as Sukhji Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents-Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner in light of judgments referred hereinabove but in case of deviation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his [2025:RJ-JP:49161] (3 of 3) [CW-16948/2025] representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /285