Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48955 (RAJ)

MADAN SON OF KISHNA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

SOSR/424/2025 · 2025-10-16

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Misc. (Suspension of Sentence) Application No.424/2025 in S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1723/2025 1. Madan Son of Kishna, Resident of Borada Police Station Shahpura District Bhilwara (At Present In Central Jail, Ajmer) 2. Suraj Son of Bhawani, Resident of Borada Police Station Shahpura District Bhilwara (At Present In Central Jail, Ajmer) ----Petitioners Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. Pokhar Son of Rampaal, Resident of Doongri Kalan, Police Station Diggi, District Tonk. 3. Kana Son of Laadu, Resident of Doongri Kalan, Police Station Diggi, District Tonk. 4. Arjun Son of Badri Baagriya, Resident of Hisaampur, Police Station Deoli District Tonk. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Vijayant Nirwan For Respondent(s) : Mr.Amit Punia, Addl.GA-cum-PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 16/10/2025 1. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the appellants have been found guilty for the offences punishable under Section 5/8 of the Rajasthan Bovine Animal Act, 1995 and they have been sentenced to undergo four years rigorous imprisonment and the appellants have been in custody since (2 of 3) [SOSA-424/2025] 30.08.2025. Counsel submits that the disposal of the instant appeal is bound to take time, therefore, the sentence awarded to the appellants by the trial Court be suspended till disposal of the appeal. 2. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the prayer raised by counsel for the appellants. 3. Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 4. Considering the arguments put forward by counsel for the appellants and looking to the fact that maximum sentence awarded to the appellants is four years and the appellants have been in custody since 30.08.2025 and disposal of the appeal is likely to take time, this Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for suspending the sentence awarded to the accused-appellants. 5. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed by the appellants under Section 430 BNSS, 2023 is allowed and the sentence awarded against the appellant (i) Madan S/o Kishna (ii) Suraj S/o Bhawani shall remain suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid appeal and subject to the condition that the appellants shall deposit a fine amount as imposed by the Trial Court and they shall be released on bail provided each of them executes a personal bond for the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Judge for their appearance in this Court on 17.11.2025 and whenever ordered to do so till the disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:- 1. That they shall appear before the Trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided. (3 of 3) [SOSA-424/2025] 2. That if the appellants change their place of residence, they will give in writing their changed address to the Trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court. 3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s) and/or mobile number, they will give in writing their changed address and/or mobile number to the Trial Court. 4. Appellant shall deposit the fine amount as imposed by the learned Trial Court. 5. In case, the appellants are found involved in committing and repeating the same offence again, the State/complainant would be at liberty to move application for cancellation of bail. 6. The learned Trial Court shall maintain the record of attendance of the accused-appellants in a separate file. Such file be registered as Criminal Misc. Case relating to original case in which the accused-appellants were tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. Case file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. 7. In case the said accused-appellants do not appear before the trial Court and/or commits any default, the learned Trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for cancellation of bail. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /11