APHC010201652019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 8811/2019 Between: 1. SK. RIZWANA, W/O REHMAN, 22 YRS, KOTHANANDAYAPALEM MANDAL, KARLAPALEM, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF A P, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR RURAL,GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KARLAPALEM GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KARLAPALEM POLICE STATION, KARLAPALEM, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MARELLA RADHA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.8811 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: <….to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not investigating the complaint FIR.No.109 of 2018 dated 14.7.2018 of Karlapalem Police Station, Guntur for tracing the petitioner's Husband is illegal, improper, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice, unconstitutional and consequently direct the 3rd and 4th respondent to conduct the investigation with regards to FIR.No.109 of 2018 dated 14.7.2018 of Karlapalem Police Station, Guntur for tracing the petitioner's Husband forthwith to pass…= 2. Heard Smt.Marella Radha, learned counsel for the writ petitioner. 3. Sri R.Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on written instructions would submit that investigation in Crime No.109 of 2018 was completed and 4th respondent traced the petitioner’s husband and handed over him to his parents and accordingly, investigation was closed by the police as per proceedings of the SDPO, Bapatla. Therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous. 4. Considering the submissions made by learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, the writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 3 As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 03.12.2025 Pmk 4 18 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:8811 OF 2019 Date: 03.12.2025 Pmk