RAJESH KUMAR YADAV S/O SHRI KAILASH CHAND YADAV v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/17125/2025 · 2025-11-20
Ashok Kumar Jain
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48947 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48947 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:46959] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17125/2025 Rajesh Kumar Yadav S/o Shri Kailash Chand Yadav, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Village Beenjhpur Post Partapur Teshil Mandan District Kotputli Behror, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Sanskrit Education, Govt. Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. The Commissioner, Sanskrit Education, Rajasthan Shiksha Sankul Campus, Jaipur.
3. The Principal, Govt. Varishtha Upadhayay Sanskrit School, Kotputli District Kotputli-Behror.
4. Giriraj Sharma Lacturer (I Gr.), Govt. Varishtha Upadhayay Sanskrit School, Kotputli, District Kotputli Behror. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Kalwaniya For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Joshi, AGC with Ms. Deepa Singh HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 20/11/2025
1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:-
“Issue any appropriate writ or direction in the nature thereof thereby the impugned transfer
order dated 23.09.2025 and relieving order dated 10.10.2025 (Annexure 1 and 2) may kindly be quashed and set aside. ii. Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby the respondents may kindly be directed to allow the petitioner
[2025:RJ-JP:46959] (2 of 2) [CW-17125/2025] continuously on the post of Lecturer at Government Varishta Upadhyay School, Kotputli Dist. Kotputli Behror.”
2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances.
3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 15 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the
order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition.
4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /28