Page No.# 1/4 GAHC040015122019 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/479/2019 TOSU REGON R/O MIRBUK VILLAGE, PASIGHAT, PO/PS PASIGHAT VERSUS THE INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. AND 3 ORS. THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT G-9, ALI YAVAR JUNG MARG, BANDRA( EAST) MUMBAI 2:THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER( RETAIL SALES) Age: 0 Occupation : TINSUKIA DIVISION OFFICE IOCL SRIPURIA TINSUKIA ASSAM. 3:THE HEAD OF DIVISION OFFICE Age: 0 Occupation : TINSUKIA DIVISIONAL OFFICE IOCL SRIPURIA TINSUKIA ASSAM 4:SHRI KALING DAI Age: 0 Occupation : R/O BALEK VILLAGE PO BALEK PS PASIGHA Page No.# 2/4 Advocate for the Petitioner : Dicky Panging, Vijay Jamoh,D Tamuk,M Doji,M Gibi,T Tayeng,B Padung Advocate for the Respondent : SC (OIC), Chorpok Modi,A Saring,Bomyom Ori,M Tunar,D K Sharma,Tabit Tapak Linked Case : IA(C)/71/2021 Kaling Dai Age: 54 Occupation : Address:S/o Late Mingkeng Dai village Balek PO Balek P.S Pasighat East Siang District Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS Tosu Regon Age: 0 Occupation : Address:S/o Kaliram Regon R/o Mirbuk PO/PS Pasighat East Siang District AP 2:Indian Oil Corporation Limited Age: 0 Occupation : Address:through its chairman having its registered office at G-9 Ali Yavar Jung Marg Bandra(East) Mumbai 3:The Deputy General Manager Age: 0 Occupation : Address:(Retail Sales) Tinsukia Divisional Office Indian Oil Corporation Office Sripuria Page No.# 3/4 Tinsukia Assam-781021 4:The Head of Divisional Office Age: 0 Occupation : Address:Tinsukia Divisional Office India Oil Corporation Ltd. Sripuria Tinsukia Assam-781021 ------------ Advocate for : T Taki Advocate for : Dicky Panging appearing for Tosu Regon: Advocate , , , appearing for 2, 3, 4, respectively. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER Date : 13-05-2025 Heard Shri D. Panging, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Shri D. K. Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the IOC and its officials. Shri Panging, learned counsel has, however, submitted that he has instruction not to press this writ petition. The aforesaid prayer has not been opposed by Shri Sharma, learned counsel for the respondents. In view of the above submission, the writ petition is dismissed as not Page No.# 4/4 pressed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. JUDGE Comparing Assistant