[2025:RJ-JP:45764] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1588/2010 Seema Wife Of Kallu Ram, aged about 22 years, R/o Village Bhatpura Tehsil Nagar At Present Sarpanch Gram Panchayat Bhatpura Tehsil Nagar, District Bharatpur. ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Mamta Yadav with Mr. Rajveer Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP Mr. Abhinav Sharma Mr. Vinod Kumar for Mr. Saransh Saini HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 13/11/2025 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner with a prayer to quash the FIR No. 125/2010 dated 11.04.2010 registered at Police Station Nagar, District, Bharatpur (Raj.) for alleged offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120B of IPC. 2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that after registration of FIR and during the pendency of the instant petition, the accused-petitioner as well as the complainant have entered into compromise. Copy whereof has also been placed on record along with interim application. As per compromise, it has been expressed by the complainant that the FIR in question was registered by the complainant on account of some mis-understanding and due to gathering wrong information however, on acquiring knowledge of correct facts, she does not [2025:RJ-JP:45764] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-1588/2010] want to prosecute the petitioner pursuant to the impugned FIR. Learned counsel for the complainant is also present before this Court and has not disputed the factum of aforesaid compromise between the parties and submitted that he has also got instructions to plead no objection on behalf of the complainant in case, the impugned FIR is quashed on the basis of compromise. This Court vide order dated 09.09.2025 and 14.10.2025 directed the Investigating Officer to conduct investigation with regard to veracity and existence of the compromise and as per the factual report dated 11.11.2025 prepared by SHO Police Station Nagar, District Deeg, the parties appeared before the Investigating Officer and submitted that compromise has taken place between the parties. 3. In the light of above, where the nature of allegations in the FIR are such which can be settled amicably out of the Court by the parties and later on, compromise has been entered into between the parties, in the light of guidelines laid down by Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303, in order to secure ends of justice and to prevent abuse of process of law, this Court deems it just and proper to exercise its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. and to quash and set aside the FIR No. No. 125/2010 dated 11.04.2010 registered at Police Station Nagar, District, Bharatpur (Raj.) along with subsequent proceedings. 4. The Criminal Misc. Petition stands allowed, accordingly. (ANAND SHARMA),J NEERU/58