SHAILESH KUMAR S/O SHRI SUGAR SINGH v. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF RECRUITMENT, INDIAN ARMY
CW/14784/2025 · 2025-10-16
Ashok Kumar Jain
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48934 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48934 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:42526] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14784/2025 Shailesh Kumar S/o Shri Sugar Singh, Aged About 24 Years, Resident Of Village Hathodi, Teh. Weir, District Bharatpur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. Director General Of Recruitment, Indian Army, West Block-Iii, R.k. Puram, New Delhi-110066.
2. Director, Headquarter Recruiting Zone (Army), Jaipur, Shastri Nagar, Post Box No. - 35, Jaipur (Rajasthan)-
302016. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajpal Dhankar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prashant Chaturvedi, Special PP with Ms. Nandini Chaturvedi HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 16/10/2025
1. Instant Writ Petition is preferred by petitioner-Shailesh Kumar S/o Shri Sugar Singh with following prayer:-
“(i) Direct the respondents to consider the candidature of the petitioner for the post of Havildar (IT/Cyber); (ii) Direct the respondents to allow the petitioner in the recruitment process for the year 2025-26.”
2.
Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the candidature of petitioner was rejected only on the ground that petitioner does not possess a degree of B.Sc. with Mathematics. He further submits that petitioner in fact has passed B.Sc. With Mathematics and he is eligible as per advertisement but the respondents have
[2025:RJ-JP:42526] (2 of 3) [CW-14784/2025] not considered his candidature only on the ground that petitioner is lacking requisite qualification.
3.
Learned counsel for respondent while referring rejection letter dated 25.08.2025 submits that present petitioner has not produced B.Sc. Mathematics/ Physics/ Chemistry degree or any other related document at Document Verification stage, and the candidate has produced a general B.Sc. Degree rather than B.Sc. Mathematics/ Physics/ Chemistry degree.
4. Having considered the contentions raised herein and also the defence as pleaded by learned counsel for respondent the only question left before us is whether the petitioner passed a degree of B.Sc. Mathematics/ Physics/ Chemistry and the contention of the petitioner is that he possess such a degree, therefore, it is appropriate to dispose of this Writ Petition with following direction(s). (I) Within four weeks, the petitioner shall submit a representation to the respondent(s) with relevant degree and mark-sheet. The respondent(s) is directed to decide the representation within 30 days, after considering the documents submitted by the petitioner. (ii) The respondent(s) shall consider and examine the degree and mark-sheet as submitted by the petitioner. (iii) In case, the petitioner possess requisite qualification then after document verification, next stage shall be followed in accordance with procedure as adopted in similarly placed candidate(s). (iv) In case, there is any deviation by the respondent(s) then a reasoned and speaking order should be passed on the
[2025:RJ-JP:42526] (3 of 3) [CW-14784/2025] representation and on rejection of documents as submitted by the petitioner same be communicated either by e-mail, if provided by the petitioner or by speed post. If he is aggrieved by the outcome of the decision by the respondent(s), he can re-approach this Court with fresh petition.
5. With aforesaid directions, the writ petition with pending application(s), if any, stands disposed.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MONU /24