IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 1225 Gurdev Singh State of Punjab and another CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. dated 09.07.2009 whereby claim of the petitioner for releasing the annual increments was rejected. 2. objection of reply by way of affidavit of the Director, Animal Husbandry, wherein it has been stated that after clearing the probation of the petitioner, his pay was re years 2003, 2004 Animal Husbandry (State Service Class released the arrears for the period during which he could not pass the departmental examination, 3. revived by demonstrating that the 21.05.2025 parveen kumar IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Gurdev Singh Versus State of Punjab and another CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY None for the petitioner. Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Prayer made in the present petition is for quashing the order dated 09.07.2009 whereby claim of the petitioner for releasing the annual increments was rejected. Learned State counsel refers objection of reply by way of affidavit of the Director, Animal Husbandry, wherein it has been stated that after clearing the probation of the petitioner, his pay was re-fixed giving him notional increments for the years 2003, 2004 and 2005, however, according to Rule 9 of the Punjab Animal Husbandry (State Service Class-II) Rules, 1981, released the arrears for the period during which he could not pass the departmental examination, to which there was no counter fil Disposed of, reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived by demonstrating that the lis still subsists. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-15568-2009 (O & M) Date of decision: 21.05.2025 ....Petitioner ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab. Prayer made in the present petition is for quashing the order dated 09.07.2009 whereby claim of the petitioner for releasing the annual Learned State counsel refers to para 1 of preliminary objection of reply by way of affidavit of the Director, Animal Husbandry, wherein it has been stated that after clearing the probation of the fixed giving him notional increments for the and 2005, however, according to Rule 9 of the Punjab II) Rules, 1981, he was not to be released the arrears for the period during which he could not pass the to which there was no counter filed. Disposed of, reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it still subsists. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.05.22 11:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.