Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:114743 Court No. - 73 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 14480 of 2025 Applicant :- Lalit Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Mata Prasad Pal,Ram Chandra Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Dinesh Pathak,J. 1. Learned AGA has filed a copy of the compliance affidavit today in Court, which is taken on record. Office to proceed accordingly. 2. As per compliance affidavit, notice is served upon the respondent No. 2, who is represented through his counsel. 3. Learned AGA pointed out that, previously, the applicant had preferred an appeal assailing the summoning order dated 10.7.2023. However, aforesaid appeal was dismissed by order dated 22.4.2024 passed by this Court. 4. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the complainant (Opposite Party No. 2) as well as learned A.G.A. representing State-opposite party No. 1 and perused the record. 5. The applicant has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 BNSS for quashing the entire proceeding of entire criminal proceedings including the bailable warrant dated 1.8.2024 in Complaint Case No. 122 of 2023 (Sushil Kumar Vs. Lalit Yadav), under Section 304 I.P.C. and Section 3(2)5 SC/ST Act, Police Station Ghiror, District Mainpuri, pending in the court of learned Special Judge SC/ST (PA) Act, Mainpuri. 6. After due deliberation at length, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that he is not pursuing the instant application on merits. He has further submitted that the present applicant is willing and ready to co-operate with the courts below and participate in the court proceedings provided some interim protection may be granted to him. It is next submitted that the present applicant has never intended to ignore the court proceedings. 7. Learned AGA as well as learned counsel for the respondent No. 2 has no objection if interim protection is granted to the present applicant to enable him to appear before the court below. 8. In this conspectus, as above, no useful purpose would be served to keep this matter pending, therefore, this Court deems it appropriate to finally dispose of the present application, without making any observation on the merits of the case as mentioned in the present application, with a direction that the present applicant, in case, appears/surrenders and moves a bail application before the court below within a period of three weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order, the same shall be considered and decided by the court concerned in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably, within a period of three weeks thereafter. 9. For a period of six weeks or till the decision on the bail application, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the present applicant. 10. As such, instant application is finally disposed of. Order Date :- 16.7.2025 vinay Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad