Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48924 (AP)

SRI KRISHNA PHARMACY AND STORES v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/23218/2025 · 2025-09-21

B S Bhanumathi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010445402025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) Monday, the Twenty Second day of September, Two Thousand Twenty Five The Honourable Ms.Justice B.S.Bhanumathi Writ Petition No.23218 of Between: Sri Krishna Pharmacy and S and The State of Andhra Pradesh and Counsel for the petitioner: 1. G.V.Gangadhar Counsel for the respondent 1. Government Pleader for Agriculture This Court made the following Order: The writ petition is filed under Article 226 of issue a writ or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the manufacture, sale and marketing of company. The petitioner company is manufacturing the brand name of ‘Sri Krishna sale and marketing of its The 2nd respondent in pursuance of the dt.21.01.2006 and consequential as being illegal, arbitrary IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) Monday, the Twenty Second day of September, Two Thousand Twenty Five Present The Honourable Ms.Justice B.S.Bhanumathi Writ Petition No.23218 of 2025 Stores ...P f Andhra Pradesh and others ...Respondents etitioner: espondents: overnment Pleader for Agriculture the following Order: The writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to a writ or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent authorities in interfering with sale and marketing of bio-products / bio-stimulants of ompany is manufacturing the bio products under the rishna Pharmacy and Stores’ manufacturing, s bio-products / bio-stimulants i.e., radient espondent in pursuance of the memo No.PPI(1)2085 2006 and consequential letter No.PPII(1) 2085 / 2005, dt. arbitrary, unconstitutional and without jurisdiction and in IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3311] Monday, the Twenty Second day of September, Two Thousand Twenty Five ...Petitioner espondents Constitution of India to a writ or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus espondent authorities in interfering with timulants of petitioner io products under the , distribution, adient, agriksing. 2085 / 2005 . 21.01.2006 unconstitutional and without jurisdiction and in 2 BSB, J W.P.No.23218 of 2025 violation of Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent authorities not to interfere with the petitioner’s business of manufacture, sale and marketing of its bio products under the name and style of ‘Sri Krishna Pharmacy and Stores’ including from the licensed premises of the petitioner company and its dealers / stockiests in the State of Andhra Pradesh under the Insecticides Act, 1968 and Fertilizers (Control) Order, 1985 and pass such other order or orders which this Court deem fit in the interest of justice. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner represented that the petitioner withdrew the writ petition. 3. In view of the representation made on behalf of the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ B.S.BHANUMATHI, J Date: 22.09.2025 GRL 3 BSB, J W.P.No.23218 of 2025 178 HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE B.S.BHANUMATHI Writ Petition No:23218 of 2025 Date:22.09.2025 GRL 4 BSB, J W.P.No.23218 of 2025