Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
269-1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
****
CWP-11180-2024 Date of Decision: 15.07.2025
Rajat Singh
...Petitioner Vs. Union of India and Others
...Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present:- Petitioner-Rajat Singh, in person.
Mr. B.S. Seemar, Advocate
for respondents No.2 and 3.
Mr. Padamkant Dwivedi, Advocate
for respondent No.4.
****
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)
1.
On 13.12.2024, the following order was passed:
“Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents No.2 and 3-CBSE in CWP No.11180 of 2024 has stated that the impugned order Annexure P-14 will be withdrawn because it was a non-speaking order and liberty may be granted to the respondents-CBSE to pass a detailed speaking order which will be passed in consonance with the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in Jigya Yadav (minor, through guardian/father Hari Singh) Versus C.B.S.E (Central Board of Secondary Education) and others, Civil Appeal No.3905 of 2011, decided on 03.06.2021, after due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and to produce any record etc.
In view of above, so far as the submissions made by
learned counsel appearing on behalf of CBSE is concerned, CBSE is granted liberty to withdraw the impugned order and to PRINCE CHAWLA 2025.07.16 09:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-11180-2024
-2-
pass a detailed well reasoned speaking order after hearing the petitioner and considering documents etc. submitted by him and also in consonance with the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in Jigya Yadav’s case (supra) within a period of three weeks thereafter. The entire exercise be completed within four weeks.
Adjourned to 22.01.2025.
A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of connected case.”
2.
The respondent-Central Board of School Education (hereinafter referred to as ‘CBSE’) has passed order dated 10.01.2025 whereby CBSE has rejected request of the petitioner to correct his Date of Birth in the Matriculation Certificate. The respondent has formed an opinion that as per their bye-laws, Date of Birth as recorded in Matriculation Certificate cannot be corrected.
3.
The petitioner does not press the instant petition in view of the order dated 10.01.2025 passed by respondent.
4.
Disposed of as not pressed.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL)
JUDGE 15.07.2025 Prince Chawla
Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether Reportable Yes/No
PRINCE CHAWLA 2025.07.16 09:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document