Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48917 (RAJ)

RAJESH KUMAR GUPTA SON OF SHRI DAMODAR PRASAD GUPTA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/17727/2025 · 2025-11-26

Ashok Kumar Jain

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:48245] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17727/2025 1. Rajesh Kumar Gupta Son Of Shri Damodar Prasad Gupta, Aged About 61 Years, Resident Of Adarsh Colony, Near Jupiter School, Mohan Nagar, Hindaun City, Karauli, Rajasthan 2. Bhajanlal Sharma Son Of Shri Bhoji Ram Sharma, Aged About 61 Years, Resident Of Nayagaon Mafi, Village- Halena, Tehsil- Weir, Bharatpur, Rajasthan ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its, Principal Secretary, Ayurved, And Bhartiya Chikitsa Vibhag, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan 2. Director, Ayurved And Bhartiya Chikitsa Vibhag, Government Of Rajasthan, Ajmer, Rajasthan 3. Deputy Director, Ayurved Vibhag, Karauli, Rajasthan 4. Director, State Insurance And Provident Fund Department, Bima Bhavan, Collectorate Road, Bani Park, Jaipur, Rajasthan ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nitesh Kumar Garg For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vishnu Dutt Sharma for Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG Mr. Aaditaya Godara, AAAG for Ms. Mahi Yadav, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Judgment / Order 26/11/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by writ petitioners with following prayer:- “(i) By issuing an appropriate writ, order or direction, the impugned order dated 28.03.2025 (Annexure-6) and impugned [2025:RJ-JP:48245] (2 of 2) [CW-17727/2025] circular dated 19.05.2025 (Annexure-8) be declared illegal and be quashed and set aside. (ii) By issuing another appropriate writ, order or direction the respondents be directed to give due salary of the petitioners to the petitioners with all consequential benefits.” 2. Mr. Vishnu Dutt Sharma accepts notice on behalf of Mr. Bhwnesh Sharma, AAG for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. 3. Mr. Aaditaya Godara, AAAG accepts notice on behalf of Ms. Mahi Yadav, AAG for respondent No.4. 4. Office is directed to reflect the names of Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG and Ms. Mahi Yadav, AAG as counsel for respondent(s). 5. Learned counsel for petitioners while referring judgment in case of Dr. Rajendra Prasad Parashar Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8496/2025) submits that the writ petition be disposed of in light of judgment in case of Dr. Rajendra Prasad Vs. State of Rajasthan (supra). 6. Having considered the submission of learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of judgment in case of Dr. Rajendra Prasad Parashar Vs. State of Rajasthan (supra). 7. With aforesaid, the writ petition and pending application(s), if any stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MONU /54