IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 130 CWP-11226-2025 (O&M) Date of decision : 25.04.2025 LAXMI CONSULTING BUREAU SERVICES LLP, THROUGH PARTNER (OM PARKASH BABBAR) ...... Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS ...... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA *** Present :- Mr. Nishant Maini, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Bansal, DAG, Haryana and Mr. Karan Jindal, AAG, Haryana for the respondent No.1-State. Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate; Ms. Saanvi Singla, Advocate and Ms. Sharvi Dadhwal, Advocate for respondent No.2-HSVP. *** SUDHIR SINGH , J. (Oral) By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner has sought issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to hand over the physical possession of commercial building and to consider representation dated 28.02.2025 (Annexure P-6) of the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that aggrieved from the inaction of the respondents, the petitioner has already filed a representation dated 28.02.2025 (Annexure P-6) upon the respondents, but RIMPAL RANI 2025.05.06 11.58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-11226-2025 :2: no action has been taken thereon till date. He further submits that the petitioner would be satisfied, if the respondent authorities are directed to deal with their concerns/grievances and pass appropriate order on the said representation. 3. Served with the advance copy of the petition, Mr. Gaurav Bansal, DAG, Haryana, for respondent No.1 and Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate for respondent No.2, are present in Court and submit that the said representation shall be considered and looked into by the competent authority, in accordance with law. 4. Without commenting on merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 (competent authority), to look into the representation dated 28.02.2025 (Annexure P-6) of the petitioner and take an appropriate action thereon, in accordance with law, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy/production of this order. 5. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA) JUDGE 25.04.2025 Rimpal Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether Reportable : No RIMPAL RANI 2025.05.06 11.58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document